Lucretius essay

The following letters were written by Dmitri Bayanov of the Darwin Museum, Moscow, Russia as a result of that article. The first is to Theo Stien, the reporter who wrote the story, and the second is to Dr.

Lucretius essay

The following letters were written by Dmitri Bayanov of the Darwin Museum, Moscow, Russia as a result of that article. The first is to Theo Stien, the reporter who wrote the story, and the second is to Dr.

Russell Mittermeier, President of Conservation International. They are published here publicly for the first time.

First of all, many thanks for Lucretius essay article—for its very positive and serious contents. Verbal support for Bigfoot researchers from some leading primatologists is refreshing news indeed.

I only wish it wouldn't remain just sort of lip-service, but turn into concrete and tangible action. Back inI wrote the following to a leading primatologist, Dr.

Shakespeare’s Worlds of Science

John Napier Lucretius essay the Smithsonian Institution: This discipline is a new branch of primatology like paleoanthropology was once a new branch of paleontology. All researchers versed in this science do know that Bigfoot is a mammal, not myth, because of the females' conspicuous mammae.

All know that Bigfoot is a primate because of the dermal ridges on its soles, a diagnostic characteristic of primates. All hominologists, respectful of logic and the current classification of primates, know that Bigfoot is a non-sapiens hominid because of its nonhuman way of life and bipedalism.

These conclusions are scientific knowledge contained in numerous books and articles. What remains still hypothetical is the exact relationship of the species with the fossil hominids, on the one hand, and Homo sapiens, on the other.

So in regard to hominology there is knowledge and there is ignorance, and it is on the basis of ignorance and reluctance to know that the reality of Bigfoot is denied. There are also scientists who know the truth, but dare not admit it out of fear for their reputations, which is a shameful situation for science.

There is nothing uncommon for a newborn science to be in a sorry plight.

Lucretius essay

The history of primatology itself is a telling example the Order of Primates was established by Carl Linnaeus indiscarded after his death and re-established a hundred years later. It is only in the 19th century that this part of zoology acquired a scientific basis.

The very term "primatology" began to be used as late as the s. Or take paleoanthropology, its birth was also long and difficult, and it was by no means immediately that the first fossils of Neandertal, Homo erectus and Australopithecus ware recognized as such. There are special ideological and methodological reasons why primatology, paleoanthropology, and now hominology, initially came up against strong opposition, but that's a long story to tell.

What is relevant here is that in the cases of primatology and paleoanthropology the resistance of conservative circles in science was broken with the help of progressive and open-minded scientists of other disciplines. And this is what hominology needs today. In this connection, I paid attention to these words in your article:Gian Francesco Poggio Bracciolini (11 February – 30 October ), best known simply as Poggio Bracciolini, was an Italian scholar and an early initiativeblog.com was responsible for rediscovering and recovering a great number of classical Latin manuscripts, mostly decaying and forgotten in German, Swiss, and French monastic .

A classic does not necessarily teach us anything we did not know before. In a classic we sometimes discover something we have always known (or thought we knew), but without knowing that this author said it first, or at least is associated with it in a special way.

And this, too, is a surprise that gives a lot of pleasure, such as we always gain from the discovery of an origin, a relationship. Shakespeare’s Worlds of Science. Natalie Elliot. New scholarship reveals a Bard brooding over the science of his day.

What can we . Online Library of Liberty. A collection of scholarly works about individual liberty and free markets. A project of Liberty Fund, Inc.

The Great Ideas Program. Contents. Volume. A General Introduction to the Great Books and to a Liberal Education; The Development of Political Theory and Government. Email Updates. Enter your email address to receive occasional updates and previews from The New Atlantis.

Lukrez – Wikipedia